Vitamin D Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ========================================================== * José María Calvo-Romero * José Manuel Ramiro-Lozano ## Abstract **Background** Vitamin D may influence many diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus. **Patients and Methods** We studied serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and associated characteristics in type 2 diabetic outpatients with pharmacologic treatment attended in internal medicine offices in a first-level hospital from Extremadura (Southern Spain). **Results** We included a total of 103 patients. Seventy-two patients (69.9%) had serum levels of 25(OH)D lower than 20 ng/mL. There was inverse correlation between serum levels of 25(OH)D and glycosylated hemoglobin (*r* = −0.74, *P* = 0.01). In 78 patients without insulin therapy, we found inverse correlation between serum levels of 25(OH)D and fasting serum insulin (*r* = −0.82, *P* = 0.001) and Homeostasis Model Assessment–Insulin Resistance (*r* = −0.51, *P* < 0.001). **Conclusions** Vitamin D deficiency is common in type 2 diabetic patients. There are inverse correlations between vitamin D and metabolic control and insulin resistance. Key Words * type 2 diabetes mellitus * insulin resistance * vitamin D There is controversy about the extraskeletal effects of vitamin D.1–4 1–4 1–4 1–4Epidemiological data together with the demonstration of the presence of vitamin D receptor in multiple organs suggest a link between vitamin D and multiple diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).1–4 1–4 1–4 1–4Vitamin D deficiency is common in all populations and age groups.1–4 1–4 1–4 1–4In a population-based study in a sunny country like Spain, 34.7% of a sample of 1226 individuals had vitamin D deficiency, defined as a level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) lower than 20 ng/mL.5We carried out a study to determine the frequency of this deficiency in type 2 diabetic patients and its associated characteristics. ## PATIENTS AND METHODS We consecutively studied all outpatients with type 2 DM with drug treatment attended in internal medicine offices of a first-level hospital in Extremadura (Southern Spain) between January and December 2013. We excluded all patients treated with vitamin D. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee in our hospital. Charlson index was used to assess comorbidity.6Glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4 Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry formula. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was measured by immunoturbidimetric assay. The glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was determined by high-resolution liquid chromatography with National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program standardization. Serum 25(OH)D and fasting insulin levels were determined by chemiluminescence. Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA)–Insulin Resistance (IR) was used to determine insulin resistance and was calculated by HOMA-2 calculator ([www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/](http://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/)).7Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 test and Fisher exact test, when any of the expected values was less than 5, for comparison of proportions and Student *t* test for comparison of means. Statistical significance was defined as *P* value less than 0.05. The correlation between variables was assessed by the correlation coefficient (*r*). ## RESULTS We included a total of 103 patients. The characteristics of all patients and patients with and without insulin therapy are described in Table 1. Seventy-two patients (69.9%) had a serum level of 25(OH)D lower than 20 ng/mL and 25 (24.3%) lower than 10 ng/mL. In 37 patients (35.9%), 25(OH)D levels were determined in March-April-May period, in 10 (9.7%) in June-July-August period, in 24 (23.3%) in September-October-November period, and in 32 (31.1%) in December-January-February period. Serum levels of 25(OH)D in June-July-August period were significantly higher than in September-October-November, December-January-February, and March-April-May periods (20.1 ± 7.7 vs 15.5 ± 7.9, 14.8 ± 9.1, and 15.2 ± 8.2 ng/mL; *P* < 0.05). Serum levels of 25(OH)D were lower in women (13.7 ± 7.3 vs 17.8 ± 9.1 ng/mL; *P* = 0.01). Serum levels of 25(OH)D lower than 20 ng/mL were significantly more common among women than among men (82.7% vs 56.9%; *P* = 0.002). Serum levels of 25(OH)D were lower in patients with body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 (14.8 ± 6.5 vs 18.3 ± 8.4 ng/mL; *P* = 0.06). The characteristics of patients with serum 25(OH)D levels lower and higher than 20 ng/mL are compared in Table 2. There was inverse correlation between serum levels of 25(OH)D and HbA1c (*r* = −0 74, *P* = 0.01) and hs-CRP (*r* = −0.77, *P* < 0.001). In 77 patients without insulin therapy, we found inverse correlation between serum 25(OH)D and fasting insulin (*r* = −0.82, *P* = 0.001) and HOMA-IR (*r* = −0.51, *P* < 0.001). View this table: [TABLE 1](/content/63/8/921/T1) TABLE 1 Characteristics of Patients View this table: [TABLE 2](/content/63/8/921/T2) TABLE 2 Comparison Between Patients With and Without Vitamin D Deficiency ## DISCUSSION The best method to determine vitamin D status is serum 25(OH)D level.1–4 1–4 1–4 1–4A consensus has defined vitamin D deficiency as a serum 25(OH)D level lower than 20 ng/mL,8although there is controversy.9Vitamin D deficiency, closely related with low sun exposure, is prevalent in all populations,1–4 1–4 1–4 1–4including type 2 diabetic patients. In Scotland, 49% of 87 patients with type 2 DM had serum 25(OH)D levels lower than 20 ng/mL during winter.10In Northern Italy, 39% of 390 type 2 diabetic patients had serum 25(OH)D levels lower than 15 ng/mL during the months of November to March.11In a series of 120 type 2 diabetic patients in a sunny Mediterranean country like Greece, 63% had serum 25(OH)D levels lower than 20 ng/mL,12similar to high frequency found in our study. Even in a Caribbean region as the French Guyana, 42% of 277 type 2 diabetic patients had serum 25(OH)D levels lower than 20 ng/mL.13We found a slight seasonal variation in serum 25(OH)D levels. In June-July-August period levels were slightly higher. Diabetic women in our study had lower serum 25(OH)D levels than males, and vitamin D deficiency was significantly more frequent among women. In a large Canadian study in general population older than 35 years, vitamin D deficiency was only slightly more common in women than in men (20.6% vs 18.3%).14Vitamin D is fat soluble and can be stored in the adipose tissue. It has shown inverse correlation between BMI and serum 25(OH)D.2,15 2,15This observation is consistent with our result of serum 25(OH)D levels lower in patients with BMI higher than 30 kg/m2, although without reaching statistical significance. One observational study showed inverse correlation between serum 25(OH)D and HbA1c.12In our study, we also observed this correlation. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had higher HbA1c, although without reaching statistical significance. These data suggest an association between vitamin D deficiency and poor metabolic control but do not allow to establish a causal relationship because they are observational studies. In a study of 152 type 2 diabetic patients, there was inverse correlation between serum 25(OH)D levels and insulin and HOMA-IR.16These results agree with those obtained in our study. HOMA-IR is a method for evaluating the degree of insulin resistance. Again, we must say that studies are observational and causality cannot be established, but there was inverse association between serum 25(OH)D levels and insulin resistance. In our study, we excluded from the HOMA-IR calculation patients treated with insulin, due to the questionable reliability of this method in these patients. As in our study, it has been described an inverse correlation between serum 25(OH)D levels and hs-CRP levels,16a marker of subclinical systemic inflammation. Different pathophysiological mechanisms may explain the negative effect of vitamin D deficiency in type 2 diabetes, through increased insulin resistance and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction.17However, some authors suggest that vitamin D may be a marker of general health.17,18 17,18Thus, a low serum 25(OH)D level might be the result of poorer health or even worse metabolic control of diabetes. In this regard, our patients with vitamin D deficiency had greater comorbidity, assessed using Charlson index, although without reaching statistical significance. Finally, it is noteworthy that there is a selection bias in our study because patients attending in internal medicine offices typically have higher age and comorbidity than type 2 diabetic patients from general population. Our results suggest the hypothesis that vitamin D status may influence metabolic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. Intervention studies must confirm or refute this hypothesis. ## References 1. 1. Wolden-Kirk H, Gysemans C, Verstuyf A, et al. Extraskeletal effects of vitamin D. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2012; 41: 571–594. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ecl.2012.05.004&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22877430&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) 2. 2. Rosen CJ, Adams JS, Bikle DD, et al. The nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 2012; 33: 456–492. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1210/er.2012-1000&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22596255&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000305089000005&link_type=ISI) 3. 3. Hossein-nezhad A, Holick MF. Vitamin D for health: a global perspective. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013; 88: 720–755. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.011&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23790560&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000321777000017&link_type=ISI) 4. 4. Wacker M, Holick MF. Vitamin D—effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation. Nutrients. 2013; 5: 111–148. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/nu5010111&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23306192&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000314026700008&link_type=ISI) 5. 5. González-Molero I, Rojo-Martínez G, Morcillo S, et al. Hypovitaminosis D and incidence of obesity: a prospective study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013; 67: 680–682. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ejcn.2013.48&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23422920&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) 6. 6. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373–383. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3558716&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1987G855900002&link_type=ISI) 7. 7. Levy JC, Matthews DR, Hermans MP. Correct homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) evaluation uses the computer program. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 2191–2192. [FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czo3OiJkaWFjYXJlIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIyMS8xMi8yMTkxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MTg6Ii9qaW0vNjMvOC85MjEuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 8. 8. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96: 1911–1930. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1210/jc.2011-0385&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21646368&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000292454500024&link_type=ISI) 9. 9. Binkley N, Wiebe D. Clinical controversies in vitamin D: 25(OH)D measurement, target concentration and supplementation. J Clin Densitom. 2013; 16: 402–408. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jocd.2013.08.006&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24183636&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) 10. 10. Sugden JA, Davies JI, Witham MD, et al. Vitamin D improves endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and low vitamin D levels. Diabet Med. 2008; 25: 320–325. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02360.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18279409&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000253609300012&link_type=ISI) 11. 11. Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 concentrations and carotid artery intima-media thickness among type 2 diabetic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006; 65: 593–597. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02633.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17054459&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) 12. 12. Kostoglou-Athanassiou I, Athanassiou P, Gkountouvas A, et al. Vitamin D and glycemic control in diabetes mellitus type 2. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 4: 122–128. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToic3B0YWUiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6NzoiNC80LzEyMiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjE4OiIvamltLzYzLzgvOTIxLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 13. 13. Vélayoudom-Céphise FL, Larifla L, Donnet JP, et al. Vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular risk factors in Caribbean patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2011; 37: 540–545. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.diabet.2011.05.005&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21764620&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) 14. 14. Greene-Finestone LS, Berger C, de Groh M, et al. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in Canadian adults: biological, environmental, and behavioral correlates. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22: 1389–1399. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00198-010-1362-7&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20730415&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) 15. 15. Jorde R, Sneve M, Emaus N, et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal relation between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and body mass index: the Tromsø study. Eur J Nutr. 2010; 49: 401–407. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00394-010-0098-7&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20204652&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000282177900003&link_type=ISI) 16. 16. Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Alokail MS, et al. Hypovitaminosis D associations with adverse metabolic parameters are accentuated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a body mass index-independent role of adiponectin? J Endocrinol Invest. 2013; 36: 1–6. 17. 17. Stivelman E, Retnakaran R. Role of vitamin D in the pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2012; 8: 42–47. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2174/157339912798829179&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22414057&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom) 18. 18. Autier P, Boniol M, Pizot C, et al. Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2: 76–89. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70165-7&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24622671&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2F63%2F8%2F921.atom)