Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1
Data points on project stages, by project type
Project stage Number of projects with available data Prospective research Retrospective research Basic science research Other project type Conception
First written outline or synopsis of project rationale and aims5 18 1 2 Funding
First funding received in direct support of the project2 5 1 0 Regulatory submission
First submission to IRB/IACUC5 8 1 0 Regulatory approval
Receipt of all approvals needed to conduct the project4 9 1 0 Start of data collection 5 18 1 1 End of data collection 4 18 1 1 Manuscript draft
First draft of manuscript, including introduction, methods, and results5 18 2 2 Manuscript submission
First submission of manuscript to peer-reviewed journal5 18 2 2 Manuscript acceptance*
Date of acceptance decision from journal5 18 2 2 Publication date
Date of earliest publication online or in print4 17 2 2 *Data set included two prospective studies, nine retrospective studies and one basic science study accepted on or after April 1, 2020.
IACUC, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee; IRB, institutional review board.
- Table 2
Project duration (in months) by project characteristics (N=27)
Characteristic Median (IQR) project duration (months) Total Development Execution Writing Submission Project type Retrospective 17 (11–19)* 2 (<1–4) 2 (1–9) 2 (1–4) 3 (2–5) Prospective 42 (24–42)* 5 (2–8) 20 (7–28) 9 (2–15) 4 (4–7) Bench science or other 7 (5–24)* 6 (<1–12) 12 (1–23) 1 (1–2) 3 (<1–4) Regulatory approval required No 11 (5–19)† <1 (<1–4) 1 (<1–3)† 2 (1–3) 3 (2–5) Yes 20 (17–38)† 3 (2–5) 7 (2–26)† 2 (1–6) 4 (3–5) External funding received No 16 (9–20)‡ 2 (<1–4)‡ 2 (1–9)‡ 2 (1–4) 3 (2–4)‡ Yes 38 (29–58)‡ 9 (5–12)‡ 25 (15–27)‡ 1 (1–12) 7 (6–14)‡ Trainee participation No 16 (5, 24) <1 (<1–4) 2 (1, 7) 3 (1, 8) 2 (1, 4) Yes 19 (11, 32) 2 (1, 4) 7 (2, 22) 2 (1, 4) 4 (3, 5) Prior presentation No 18 (10, 19) 3 (1, 4) 2 (1, 8)§ 2 (1, 4) 3 (2, 5) Yes 21 (11, 40) 2 (<1, 5) 7 (3, 26)§ 2 (1, 4) 4 (3, 6) *Statistically significant difference across project types (p<0.05) on Kruskal-Wallis test.
†Statistically significant difference according to need for regulatory approval (p<0.05) on rank-sum test.
‡Statistically significant difference according to receipt of external funding (p<0.05) on rank-sum test.
§Statistically significant difference according to prior presentation (p<0.05) on rank-sum test.
Vol 70 Issue 1
Table of Contents
