Deregulated profiles of urinary microRNAs may explain podocyte injury and proximal tubule dysfunction in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus ================================================================================================================================================================ * Oana Milas * Florica Gadalean * Adrian Vlad * Victor Dumitrascu * Cristina Gluhovschi * Gheorghe Gluhovschi * Silvia Velciov * Roxana Popescu * Flaviu Bob * Petru Matusz * Agneta-Maria Pusztai * Octavian M Cretu * Alina Secara * Anca Simulescu * Sorin Ursoniu * Daliborca Vlad * Ligia Petrica ## Abstract MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNA species that are important post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression. The aim of the study was to establish a potential explanation of podocyte damage and proximal tubule (PT) dysfunction induced by deregulated miRNAs expression in the course of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). A total of 68 patients with type 2 DM and 11 healthy subjects were enrolled in a cross-sectional study and assessed concerning urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR), urinary *N*-acetyl-β-D-glucosamininidase (NAG), urinary kidney injury molecule-1, urinary nephrin, podocalyxin, synaptopodin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192. In univariable regression analysis, miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192 correlated with urinary nephrin, synaptopodin, podocalyxin, NAG, KIM-1, UACR, and eGFR. Multivariable regression analysis yielded models in which miRNA192 correlated with synaptopodin, uNAG, and eGFR (R2=0.902; P<0.0001), miRNA124 correlated with synaptopodin, uNAG, UACR, and eGFR (R2=0.881; P<0.0001), whereas miRNA21 correlated with podocalyxin, uNAG, UACR, and eGFR (R2=0.882; P<0.0001). Urinary miRNA192 expression was downregulated, while urinary miRNA21 and miRNA124 expressions were upregulated. In patients with type 2 DM, there is an association between podocyte injury and PT dysfunction, and miRNA excretion, even in the normoalbuminuria stage. This observation documents a potential role of the urinary profiles of miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192 in early DN. Despite their variability across the segments of the nephron, urinary miRNAs may be considered as a reliable tool for the identification of novel biomarkers in order to characterize the genetic pattern of podocyte damage and PT dysfunction in early DN of type 2 DM. * diabetes complications * rna, messenger ### Significance of this study #### What is already known about this subject? * To date, emerging data show that, the mechanisms of albuminuria in diabetes mellitus may be related mainly to an impaired tubular uptake of intact albumin questioning the hypothesis of an increased leakiness of the glomerular filter. * MiRNAs have a high potential to modulate cellular and biochemical functions, leading to the initiation or progression of various diseases, including diabetic nephropathy. * There are overexpressed miRNAs in the diabetic kidney, leading to initiation and progression of renal fibrosis, while downregulated miRNAs displayed renal protective effects. #### What are the new findings? * The study demonstrates an association between podocyte injury and PT dysfunction, and miRNA excretion, even in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 DM. * This observation documents a potential role of the profiles of miRNA21, miRNA124, miRNA192 in early DN. The expression of miRNA192 was downregulated, while that one of miRNA21 and miRNA124 was upregulated. * This phenomenon is independent of albuminuria and level of renal function. ### Significance of this study #### How might these results change the focus of research or clinical practice? * The strength of the study relies on the documentation of a relation between urinary miRNAs and biomarkers of podocyte injury and PT dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. * This observation points to the clinical importance of urinary miRNAs in the diagnosis of early renal involvement in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes, often perceived as a group of patients at low risk of developing DN. * Urinary miRNAs may be considered as a reliable tool for the the identification of novel biomarkers in order to characterize the genetic pattern of podocyte damage and PT dysfunction in early DN of type 2 DM. ## Introduction Diabetes mellitus (DM) is globally the leading cause of end-stage renal disease, accounting for >40 per cent of patients with both type 1 and type 2 DM undergoing renal replacement therapies.1–3 Until recently it has been postulated that the underlying mechanism of albuminuria in diabetic nephropathy (DN) is represented by defects in the structure of the glomerular filtration barrier.4 5 In view of this hypothesis, it is assumed that albuminuria is correlated with the severity of the glomerular lesions, but this phenomenon is not indispensable in preceding the onset of albuminuria, a fact demonstrated in biopsy studies in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 DM and impaired renal function.6 7 To date, emerging data show that the mechanisms of albuminuria in DM may be related mainly to an impaired tubular uptake of intact albumin questioning the hypothesis of an increased leakiness of the glomerular filter.8 9 Previously, we demonstrated in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes that proximal tubule (PT) dysfunction precedes the occurrence of albuminuria. It is possible that in early DN, sequentially, PT dysfunction may precede glomerular injury.10 11 Patients with subclinical DN and those with early DN may display more abnormal tubular injury markers that show PT dysfunction, which implies selective albumin processing mainly by the retrieval pathway and less by the degradation pathway of the PT.12 The glomerulus normally leaks nephrotic levels of albumin, retrieved and processed by the PT.8 9 The signaling system from the glomerulus to the PT may turn off the pathway of intact albumin in the course of DM.13 Nephrin is a key component of the glomerular filtration barrier. The impairment to the size selectivity of the slit diaphragm, which is located between the foot processes of the podocytes, is due to nephrin alterations.4 Normoalbuminuric patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes may display increased levels of nephrinuria, a phenomenon that demonstrates that nephrinuria may precede microalbuminuria.14–17 Synaptopodin is an actin-associated podocyte protein that establishes the podocyte specific bundling of the microfilaments in the foot processes.18 Podocalyxin is a transmembrane protein that localizes to the apical cell of glomerular podocytes. Podocalyxin maintains the shape of podocytes and of the slit diaphragm. The levels of urinary podocalyxin increase significantly and correlate with DN progression.19 MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenously produced short non-coding RNAs of about 21–25 nucleotides that have been shown to play important roles in modulating gene expression, thus affecting almost every key cellular function.20 miRNAs have a high potential to modulate cellular and biochemical functions, leading to the initiation or progression of various diseases, including DN.21 miRNA-192 induces upregulation of fibrotic genes, thus promoting increased glomerular sclerosis and fibrosis.22 Several studies show that upregulation of miRNA-192 expression in tubular cells treated with transforming growth factor (TGF)β1 increased fibrosis.22 By contrast, miR-192 has been shown to be downregulated in cultured proximal tubular epithelial cells treated with high glucose or TGF β1, a fact that was associated with increased fibrosis. Moreover, there are studies that showed that miR-192 leads to depression of E-cadherin, thus exerting an antifibrotic effect.23 24 Apart from miRNA-192, there have been described other profibrotic miRNAs, such as miRNA-2125 and miRNA-124, which may exert a role in podocyte adhesion damage under mechanical stress.26 The aim of our study was to establish a potential explanation of podocyte damage and PT dysfunction induced by deregulated miRNAs expression in the course of type 2 DM. The profiles of urinary miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192 were assessed in relation to DN stage. ## Subjects, materials, and methods ### Patients’ enrollment criteria A total of 68 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes (26 patients with normoalbuminuria, 24 patients with microalbuminuria, and 18 patients with macroalbuminuria) recruited from the Outpatient Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases and 11 healthy control subjects were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. The inclusion criteria were duration of diabetes >5 years, categories of albuminuria, such as normoalbuminuria (urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) <30 mg/g), microalbuminuria (UACR 30–300 mg/g), or macroalbuminuria (UACR >300 mg/g). Patients were classified according to levels of UACR measured in the ambulatory clinic, prior to inclusion in the study. All patients were on ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers, other antihypertensive agents (including diuretics), and statins. There were no differences in diuretic usage between groups. SGLT-2 inhibitors were not used. Also, all patients were treated with oral antidiabetic agents. There were no significant differences between the therapies across the studied groups. The biomarkers of PT dysfunction included urinary *N*-acetyl-β*-*D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), while the biomarkers of podocyte damage assessed were urinary nephrin, urinary synaptopodin, and urinary podocalyxin. UACR and serum cystatin C were also assessed. Serum and urinary biomarkers were determined in specimens frozen at −80°C and thawed before assay. Urinary variables were assessed in triplicate on aliquots from the same first morning urine sample (midstream urine). The ELISA assessments were performed as per protocol indicated by the manufacturer in triplicate assessments for each patient from the same aliquot. The inter-assay or intra-assay coefficients of variance (CVs) were indicated according to the data provided by the manufacturer’s brochure.17 27 28 The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by the combined method that uses serum creatinine and serum cystatin C, according to the KDIGO Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.29 30 ### Biomarkers of podocyte damage The biological samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was aliquoted in 0.5 mL volumes. Samples were stored at −80°C, and aliquots were thawed for ELISA assays. Blanks and standards were assayed according to the manufacturer’s instructions for all assays. The test was performed in triplicate. The mean values of absorbance and concentration were plotted and a 4 Parameter Logistic non-linear regression model was used (R2>0.97 was accepted). The intra-assay variability was <10 per cent. The inter-assay of the test showed a CV <10 per cent.17 27 28 *Nephrin* was assessed by Human Nephrin ELISA Kit; Abbexa, 16 Iceni Way, Cambridge, CB4 2NZ, UK, cat. no.: abx051402; test range: 35–2000 pg/mL. The repeatability of the test showed a CV<10 per cent.17 27 28 *Synaptopodin* was assessed by Human Synaptopodin ELISA Kit; Abbexa, cat. no.: abx055120; test range: 18–1000 pg/mL. *Podocalyxin* was assessed by Human Podocalyxin ELISA Kit; Abbexa, cat. no.: abx51856; test range: 26–1500 pg/mL. ### Biomarkers of PT dysfunction *NAG* was assessed by Human *N*-Acetyl-β-D-Glucosaminidase ELISA Kit; Abbexa, cat. no.: abx53752; test range: 0.06–4 ng/mL. *KIM-1* was assessed by KIM-1 ELISA test kit for the detection of KIM-1 in human urine, cat. no. H-RENA-E-001, Bio Assay Works, Ijamsville, Maryland, USA. A human KIM-1 antibody was used, and the detection level was set at urinary KIM-1<0.150 ng/mL.17 27 28 ### Albuminuria and cystatin C *Albuminuria* was measured through immunonephelometry on the BNProSpec System, with N Antiserum to Human Albumin (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany). Microalbuminuria was defined by UACR between 30 and 300 mg/g, and normoalbuminuria by UACR<30 mg/g. The N Antiserum to Human Albumin was evaluated for the assay of urine on a BN System and yielded a Within-Run CV of 2.2 per cent and a total CV of 2.6 per cent with a mean of 79 mg/L. The results (10 runs, four determinations per run) were evaluated by analysis of variance, according to the manufacturer’s brochure. Urinary tract infections were ruled out by negative urine cultures in all patients.17 27 28 *Cystatin C* was assessed in serum with N latex cystatin C kit (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) through particle-enhanced immunonephelometry using the BNProSpec System. The reference interval was calculated non-parametrically and was determined to be 0.53–0.95 mg/L. The intra-assay precision was 2.5 per cent CV, and inter-assay precision was 2.0 per cent CV with a total of 2.8 per cent CV. Analytical sensitivity was calculated as 2 SD above the mean signal of 20 replicates of N diluent and was determined to be 0.005 mg/L. A typical detection for N latex cystatin C is 0.05 mg/L.17 27 28 ### miRNAs assessment Total RNA was isolated from the urine samples using the Urine microRNA Purification Kit, Norgen Biotek Corporation, 3430 Schmon Parkway, Thorold, ON, Canada, cat. no. 29000. Total RNA was stored at −80°C. The quantity and quality of total RNA was verified, and reverse transcription was performed using the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems (ABI), Foster City, California, USA). cDNA were amplified using the TaqMan MicroRNA Assay for *specific miRNAs (miRNA21, miRNA124* and *miRNA192)* and TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix. The PCR reaction was performed on a 7900HT real-time PCR System. Urine samples were run in triplicate, and relative expression level of specific gene was calculated using the SDS software V.2.4, and U6 small nuclear RNA as the endogenous control. Fold-change of expression was calculated using the comparative Ct method (Δct). ### Statistical analysis Data are presented as medians and IQR as for variables with skewed distribution. According to the distribution of the values, differences between subgroups were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test for comparison of two groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison of four groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted in order to evaluate the significance of the relation between miRNAs and other continuous variables. The P values for all hypothesis tests were two-sided, and statistical significance was set at P<0.05. All analyses were conducted with Stata V.9.2. ## Results All patients and controls were included in the analysis. The demographic, clinical, and biological data of the patients and control subjects are presented in table 1. As there were no significant differences between the therapies across the studied groups, the medications prescribed could not bias the interpretation of data. Whether renoprotective agents such as RAS inhibitors would have any effect on miRNAs in early DN remains to be determined. View this table: [Table 1](/content/early/2018/01/05/jim-2017-000556/T1) Table 1 Clinical and biological data of the patients studied Univariable logistic regression showed correlations of miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192 with urinary nephrin, urinary synaptopodin, urinary podocalyxin, UACR, urinary KIM-1, urinary NAG, cystatin C, and eGFR (table 2). View this table: [Table 2](/content/early/2018/01/05/jim-2017-000556/T2) Table 2 Univariable analysis for the urinary miRNAs Multivariable regression analysis resulted in a model in which miRNA192 correlated with synaptopodin, uNAG, and eGFR (R2=0.902; P<0.0001), miRNA124 correlated with synaptopodin, uNAG, UACR, and eGFR (R2=0.881; P<0.0001), while miRNA21 correlated with podocalyxin, uNAG, UACR, and eGFR (R2=0.882; P<0.0001). Adjustment for potential confounders, such as lipid profile, HbA1c, and high-sensitive C reactive protein, was performed in order to avoid bias in the interpretation of data. Urinary miRNA192 expression was downregulated, while urinary miRNA21 and miRNA124 expressions were upregulated (table 3). View this table: [Table 3](/content/early/2018/01/05/jim-2017-000556/T3) Table 3 Multivariable analysis for the urinary miRNAs ## Discussion The vast majority of data with regard to miRNAs derive from animal studies, while human studies are lacking and rely mostly on findings from renal biopsies and less from the urine. There are overexpressed miRNAs in the diabetic kidney, leading to initiation and progression of renal fibrosis, while downregulated miRNAs displayed renal protective effects. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate an association between podocyte injury and PT dysfunction, and miRNA excretion, even in the normoalbuminuria stage in patients with type 2 DM. This observation documents a potential role of the profiles of miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192 in early DN. The expression of miRNA192 was downregulated, while that of miRNA21 and miRNA124 was upregulated. This phenomenon is independent of albuminuria and the level of renal function. ### miRNA21 and miRNA124 are upregulated, while miRNA192 is downregulated and correlate with podocyte damage biomarkers in early DN Urinary elimination of nephrin is highly indicative of podocyte lesions in the course of DN. In our study, nephrinuria correlated directly with miRNA21 and miRNA124, and indirectly with miRNA192. The levels of nephrin were increased in all patients, including normoalbuminuric patients, and the correlations were found across all study groups. These data are in keeping with a previous study performed in patients with type 2 diabetes in whom we demonstrated that nephrinuria showed significant correlations with UACR, biomarkers of PT dysfunction, renal function, and urinary advanced glycation end products.17 In another study conducted by us in patients with type 2 DM, urinary podocytes correlated with the levels of urinary alpha1-microglobulin and urinary KIM-1, even in patients with high-to-normal levels of albuminuria. This observation points to a concomitant podocyte injury and PT dysfunction, the latter phenomenon showing the crucial role of the PT in albumin processing in early DN.27 Furthermore, in patients with type 2 DM, there is an association between urinary podocyte-derived mRNA levels, and podocyte injury and PT dysfunction biomarkers.28 The levels of urinary synaptopodin and urinary podocalyxin paralleled those of urinary nephrin and followed the same correlation pattern with the miRNAs studied. Urinary synaptopodin levels increase as DN advances, thus proving that urinary synaptopodin is a sensitive biomarker of DN, predicting disease progression.18 In a study performed in patients with type 2 DM, urinary podocalyxin was increased in 53.8 per cent normoalbuminuric patients, 64.7 per cent microalbuminuric patients, and 66.7 per cent macroalbuminuric patients, respectively, thus showing early lesions to the podocytes in patients with diabetes.19 There are few data in the literature that show that miRNA21 is involved at the glomerular level in DN. miRNA21 was found strongly related to hyperglycemia, thus contributing to renal cell hypertrophy and matrix expansion.31 Most likely, miRNA21 displays the same activity on the podocytes, thus explaining the high levels of nephrinuria, urinary synaptopodin, and urinary podocalyxin found in our study. However, controversial reports show that deletion of miRNA21 induces severe cellular damage, especially to the podocytes, due to upregulation of the pro-apoptotic targets of miRNA21, thus leading to podocyte loss, mesangial expansion, and albuminuria.32 As for miRNA192, this is for the first time that this miRNA was studied in relation to podocyte damage biomarkers. As far as our study is concerned, urinary miRNA192 levels were downregulated in our patients and correlated indirectly with urinary nephrin, synaptopodin, and podocalyxin, a fact that could allow for the speculation that miRNA192 may exert protective effects within the glomerulus, in early stages of DN. According to the results of our study, it may be hypothesized that miRNA192 expression varies across the segments of the nephron by exerting a protective effect mainly within the tubulointerstitial compartment, but also within the glomerulus. Podocytes are highly specialized glomerular cells, a component of major importance of the glomerular filtration barrier. It has been demonstrated that they adhere to the glomerular basement membrane through cell–matrix adhesion receptor INTEGRIN α3β1. This receptor is a target of miRNA124 and explains a potential intervention of miRNA124 in podocyte adhesion damage under mechanical stress.26 In our study, nephrinuria correlated directly with miRNA124 and this correlation holds true for synaptopodin, as well as for podocalyxin excretion. We assume that this phenomenon may be attributed to miRNA124 involvement in podocyte structure and function. ### miRNA profiles present with high variability in association with PT dysfunction in early DN In early DN, the mechanisms of albuminuria rely on an impairment in the retrieval pathway of albumin in the PT that precedes glomerular damage.9 In early DN, urinary NAG and urinary KIM-1 are biomarkers that allow for an accurate detection of PT dysfunction. Several studies performed in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 DM showed that these patients displayed increased levels of NAG12 33 and of urinary KIM-1,17 34 thus demonstrating that tubular functional defects precede the onset of albuminuria. Moreover, other studies reported that in patients with type 2 diabetes, urinary tubular biomarkers were independently associated with albuminuria in the early stage of DN.34 Higher levels of urinary KIM-1 were found in type 2 diabetes patients with glomerular hyperfiltration as compared with patients with normal eGFR, showing that this glomerular phenomenon is a trigger for PT dysfunction in early DN.35 Also, urinary NAG has been proved a reliable biomarker of PT dysfunction in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes.36 37 In our study, urinary nephrin, synaptopodin, and podocalyxin correlated with the levels of urinary NAG and urinary KIM-1, even in patients with high-to-normal levels of albuminuria. This observation points to a concomitant podocyte injury and PT dysfunction, the latter phenomenon showing the role of major importance of the PT in albumin processing in early DN. The miRNA expression profiles of miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192 correlated with urinary NAG and urinary KIM-1, thus proving a potential molecular signature of these miRNAs at tubulointerstitial level. Several studies carried out in experimental models and in human studies have provided data that show that inhibition of miRNA192 decreased renal fibrosis.22 24 On the contrary, in other studies, it has been postulated that loss of miRNA192 might promote fibrogenesis in advanced DN.38 miRNA192 was shown to be downregulated in cultured proximal tubular epithelial cells treated with high glucose or TGFβ1, a phenomenon that was associated with increased fibrosis.38 In another study, however, it was reported that miRNA192 expression in tubular cells treated with TGFβ1 increased tubulointerstitial fibrosis.39 In our study, the indirect correlation of miRNA192 with the PT dysfunction biomarkers in normoalbuminuric patients leads to the hypothesis that miRNA192 might display a certain protective effect against tubulointerstitial fibrosis, starting from the early stages of DN. These controversial results with regard to miRNA192 could be explained in part by the high variability of miRNA expression according to cell-type-specific effects of miRNAs,40 cell-specific transcription factors, and differences in the experimental models studied.39 We assume that in our patients miRNA192 expression varied with the type of cells involved, presumably most prominently within the tubulointerstitial compartment compared with the glomerulus, namely the podocytes. The same controversial aspects have been forwarded concerning miRNA21, which has been shown to promote and increase fibrosis, inflammation, and albuminuria in type 2 diabetes,25 31 while Lai observed that miRNA21 correlated with podocyte injury, but not with tubulointerstitial fibrosis.32 Our patients followed this trend, miRNA21 being correlated directly with albuminuria, podocyte damage, and with PT dysfunction biomarkers. In the KK-AY mouse model of DN, miRNA21 played an important role in renal fibrosis by targeting matrix metalloproteinase-9 and metalloproteinase inhibitor 1.25 Fiorentino *et al* showed in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes, as well as in kidney biopsies from patients with DN that miRNA 21 was upregulated, thus initiating and promoting renal fibrosis.41 miRNA124 was upregulated in our study and correlated with albuminuria and PT dysfunction biomarkers. Very few data emerge from the literature with regard to miRNA124, mainly related to podocyte damage, as discussed above. We assume that, according to our data, miRNA124 may be involved in tubulointerstitial fibrosis as well, a fact that should be proved by further studies. It is likely that the PT delays the expression of podocyte injury, although patients display podocyte damage biomarkers and a particular miRNA profile, while remaining normoalbuminuric. Presumably, factors that drive changes to the glomerulus are the same as those that affect PT cells processing of albumin. Therefore, the onset of albuminuria and its progressive increase may be considered a matter of sequence in the course of DN. ### miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192 are independent of the renal function decline The biomarkers of PT dysfunction are associated with renal function as assessed by eGFR and cystatin C, irrespective of the level of albuminuria.42 43 Moreover, the same applies for podocyte injury biomarkers as was reported by several studies and by our results with regard to nephrin, synaptopodin, and podocalyxin. Other podocyte injury biomarkers studied in patients with type 2 diabetes and DN, such as urinary podocalyxin positive element, correlated with albuminuria, serum cystatin C, and eGFR.44 Previously, we showed that podocyte injury biomarkers, such as nephrin and vascular endothelial growth factor, may be associated to renal function decline independently of albuminuria. We assumed that this association is most likely related to PT dysfunction, the PT being a key player in albumin, as well as in podocyte injury biomarkers uptake and processing.17 It has been reported that decreased eGFR may correlate with the degree of albuminuria within normal range.10 11 17 The results of our study are in line with other studies that reveal that cystatin C may parallel the degree of albuminuria, even in high-to-normal albuminuria.45 46 Our data, which show that the urinary miRNAs studied and the biomarkers of PT dysfunction are independent of the level of renal function, are in keeping with studies that reveal a progressive decline in renal function in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes.47 miRNA21 and miRNA 124 showed increased levels the more the stage of DN progressed, a fact that might suggest a deleterious intervention of these miRNAs within the glomerulus, as well as the tubulointerstitium. By contrast, miRNA192 presented with decreased expression and correlated directly with eGFR, more accurately assessed in our study by means of serum creatinine and cystatin C.30 The correlation of decreased urinary miRNA192 with eGFR could imply that the decreased levels of eGFR may be associated to loss of miRNA192 expression within the tubulointerstitial compartment, thus pleading in favor of a protective effect of miRNA192, a fact supported by several studies.23 38 These results, however, are in contrast to other studies in which renal function declined progressively with the increasing levels of miRNA192, which is believed to promote fibrosis.22 24 These pleiotropic roles of miRNA192 in the kidney, either anti-fibrotic or pro-fibrotic, may be cell-type dependent.48 There are several limitations of our study to be mentioned. First, the small size of the study groups interferes with the statistical significance of the study. Second, this is a cross-sectional study that requires validation by a prospective study in order to prove that podocyte injury and PT dysfunction are associated with a particular miRNA profile, phenomenon that holds true in the long term in patients with type 2 diabetes and predicts evolution from normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria. Third, the differences in urinary miRNAs expression among the glomerular and tubulointerstitial compartments may be explained by the large variability of miRNAs excretion into the urine in the renal segments and across the groups studied. Finally, urinary miRNAs’ excretion variability should be taken into account in relation to cell-specific type and the particular models studied. The strength of our study relies on the documentation of a relation between urinary miRNAs and biomarkers of podocyte injury and PT dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes, even in the normoalbuminuria stage. This observation points to the clinical importance of urinary miRNAs in the assessment of early renal involvement in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes, often perceived as a group of patients at low risk of developing DN. ## Conclusion In conclusion, in patients with type 2 DM there is an association between podocyte injury and PT dysfunction, and miRNA excretion, even in the normoalbuminuric patients. This observation documents a potential role of the miRNA profiles of miRNA21, miRNA124, and miRNA192 in early DN. Urinary miRNAs excretion and their deregulated expression parallels PT dysfunction, a process that is independent of albuminuria and renal function. Despite their variability across the segments of the nephron, urinary miRNAs may be considered as a reliable tool for the identification of novel biomarkers in order to characterize the genetic pattern of podocyte damage and PT dysfunction in early DN of type 2 DM. Further research on larger cohorts is required with regard to a translational approach of these results in the clinical practice. ## Footnotes * Gheorghe Gluhovschi deceased. * DV and LP contributed equally. * Contributors OM and AV made substantial contributions to conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data. FG, AlS, and AnS did acquisition of data, drafting of the article, and IT technical assistance. VD did biochemical and ELISA assessments, analysis and interpretation of data. CG and FB did acquisition of data. GG revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. RP and DV did biochemical and ELISA assessments, and miRNAs assessments. SV did analysis and interpretation of data. PM did acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of the article. A-MP and OMC did design, analysis, and interpretation of data. SU did statistical analysis and interpretation of data. LP made substantial contributions to conception, design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the article, and final approval of the version to be published. RP and DV contributed equally to the article. All authors are in agreement with the content of the manuscript. * Funding This research received funding from an Internal Grant of ’Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, PIII-C5-PCFI-2017/2018. * Disclaimer The supporting source had no involvement in study design, in collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. * Competing interests None declared. * Patient consent Obtained. * Ethics approval The County Emergency Hospital Timisoara Ethical Committee (Board of Human Studies) approved the protocol (approval number 12/20 February 2016). * Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. * Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. The equal contributor statement has been updated to read: ’DV and LP contributed equally'. ## References 1. Atkins RC, Zimmet P. Diabetic kidney disease: act now or pay later. Kidney Int 2010;77:375–7.[doi:10.1038/ki.2009.509](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.509) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ki.2009.509&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20150934&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 2. U.S. Renal Data System. Annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2013. [http://www.usrds.org/2013/pdf/v2\_ch12\_13.pdf/](http://www.usrds.org/2013/pdf/v2_ch12_13.pdf/) (accessed 19 Sep 2016). 3. Serban V, Timar R, Dabelea D, et al. The epidemiology of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus in Romania. ONROCAD Study Group. National Romanian organisation for the care of diabetic children and adolescents. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2001;14:535–41. [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11393575&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 4. Jefferson JA, Shankland SJ, Pichler RH. Proteinuria in diabetic kidney disease: a mechanistic viewpoint. Kidney Int 2008;74:22–36.[doi:10.1038/ki.2008.128](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2008.128) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ki.2008.128&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18418356&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000256788900006&link_type=ISI) 5. Nakagawa T, Tanabe K, Croker BP, et al. Endothelial dysfunction as a potential contributor in diabetic nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 2011;7:36–44.[doi:10.1038/nrneph.2010.152](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2010.152) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrneph.2010.152&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21045790&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 6. Ekinci EI, Jerums G, Skene A, et al. Renal structure in normoalbuminuric and albuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes and impaired renal function. Diabetes Care 2013;36:3620–6.[doi:10.2337/dc12-2572](http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2572) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiMzYvMTEvMzYyMCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjQyOiIvamltL2Vhcmx5LzIwMTgvMDEvMDUvamltLTIwMTctMDAwNTU2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 7. Kramer HJ, Nguyen QD, Curhan G, et al. Renal insufficiency in the absence of albuminuria and retinopathy among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2003;289:3273–7.[doi:10.1001/jama.289.24.3273](http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.24.3273) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.289.24.3273&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12824208&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000183704600020&link_type=ISI) 8. Comper WD, Haraldsson B, Deen WM. Resolved: normal glomeruli filter nephrotic levels of albumin. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;19:427–32.[doi:10.1681/ASN.2007090997](http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2007090997) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiam5lcGhyb2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMTkvMy80MjciO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo0MjoiL2ppbS9lYXJseS8yMDE4LzAxLzA1L2ppbS0yMDE3LTAwMDU1Ni5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 9. Russo LM, Sandoval RM, Campos SB, et al. Impaired tubular uptake explains albuminuria in early diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:489–94.[doi:10.1681/ASN.2008050503](http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2008050503) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiam5lcGhyb2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMjAvMy80ODkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo0MjoiL2ppbS9lYXJseS8yMDE4LzAxLzA1L2ppbS0yMDE3LTAwMDU1Ni5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 10. Petrica L, Petrica M, Vlad A, et al. Proximal tubule dysfunction is dissociated from endothelial dysfunction in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. Nephron Clin Pract 2011;118:155–64.[doi:10.1159/000320038](http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000320038) 11. Petrica L, Vlad A, Petrica M, et al. Pioglitazone delays proximal tubule dysfunction and improves cerebral vessel endothelial dysfunction in normoalbuminuric people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;94:22–32.[doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.05.032](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.05.032) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21726916&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 12. Zhang Y, Yang J, Zheng M, et al. Clinical characteristics and predictive factors of subclinical diabetic nephropathy. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2015;123:132–8.[doi:10.1055/s-0034-1396810](http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1396810) 13. Russo LM, Srivatsan S, Seaman M, et al. Albuminuria associated with CD2AP knockout mice is primarily due to dysfunction of the renal degradation pathway processing of filtered albumin. FEBS Lett 2013;587:3738–41.[doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.09.045](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.09.045) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.febslet.2013.09.045&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24140342&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 14. Jim B, Ghanta M, Qipo A, et al. Dysregulated nephrin in diabetic nephropathy of type 2 diabetes: a cross sectional study. PLoS One 2012;7:e36041.[doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036041](http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036041) 15. Ng DP, Tai BC, Tan E, et al. Nephrinuria associates with multiple renal traits in type 2 diabetes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:2508–14.[doi:10.1093/ndt/gfq738](http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq738) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ndt/gfq738&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21196468&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 16. Pätäri A, Forsblom C, Havana M, et al. Nephrinuria in diabetic nephropathy of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2003;52:2969–74.[doi:10.2337/diabetes.52.12.2969](http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.52.12.2969) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiZGlhYmV0ZXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTA6IjUyLzEyLzI5NjkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo0MjoiL2ppbS9lYXJseS8yMDE4LzAxLzA1L2ppbS0yMDE3LTAwMDU1Ni5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 17. Petrica L, Vlad A, Gluhovschi G, et al. Proximal tubule dysfunction is associated with podocyte damage biomarkers nephrin and vascular endothelial growth factor in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2014;9:e112538.[doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112538](http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112538) 18. Asanuma K, Yanagida-Asanuma E, Faul C, et al. Synaptopodin orchestrates actin organization and cell motility via regulation of RhoA signalling. Nat Cell Biol 2006;8:485–91.[doi:10.1038/ncb1400](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1400) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ncb1400&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16622418&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000237299400012&link_type=ISI) 19. Hara M, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, et al. Urinary podocalyxin is an early marker for podocyte injury in patients with diabetes: establishment of a highly sensitive ELISA to detect urinary podocalyxin. Diabetologia 2012;55:2913–9.[doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2661-7](http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2661-7) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00125-012-2661-7&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22854890&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000309561600006&link_type=ISI) 20. Bhatt K, Mi QS, Dong Z. microRNAs in kidneys: biogenesis, regulation, and pathophysiological roles. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2011;300:F602–F610.[doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00727.2010](http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00727.2010) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiYWpwcmVuYWwiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTA6IjMwMC8zL0Y2MDIiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo0MjoiL2ppbS9lYXJseS8yMDE4LzAxLzA1L2ppbS0yMDE3LTAwMDU1Ni5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 21. Trionfini P, Benigni A. MicroRNAs as master regulators of glomerular function in health and disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28:1686–96.[doi:10.1681/ASN.2016101117](http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2016101117) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiam5lcGhyb2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiMjgvNi8xNjg2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NDI6Ii9qaW0vZWFybHkvMjAxOC8wMS8wNS9qaW0tMjAxNy0wMDA1NTYuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 22. Kato M, Arce L, Wang M, et al. A microRNA circuit mediates transforming growth factor-β1 autoregulation in renal glomerular mesangial cells. Kidney Int 2011;80:358–68.[doi:10.1038/ki.2011.43](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.43) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ki.2011.43&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21389977&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000293264900007&link_type=ISI) 23. Wang B, Herman-Edelstein M, Koh P, et al. E-cadherin expression is regulated by miR-192/215 by a mechanism that is independent of the profibrotic effects of transforming growth factor-beta. Diabetes 2010;59:1794–802.[doi:10.2337/db09-1736](http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db09-1736) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiZGlhYmV0ZXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiNTkvNy8xNzk0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NDI6Ii9qaW0vZWFybHkvMjAxOC8wMS8wNS9qaW0tMjAxNy0wMDA1NTYuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 24. Putta S, Lanting L, Sun G, et al. Inhibiting microRNA-192 ameliorates renal fibrosis in diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;23:458–69.[doi:10.1681/ASN.2011050485](http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2011050485) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiam5lcGhyb2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMjMvMy80NTgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo0MjoiL2ppbS9lYXJseS8yMDE4LzAxLzA1L2ppbS0yMDE3LTAwMDU1Ni5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 25. Wang J, Gao Y, Ma M, et al. Effect of miR-21 on renal fibrosis by regulating MMP-9 and TIMP1 in kk-ay diabetic nephropathy mice. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013;67:537–46.[doi:10.1007/s12013-013-9539-2](http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12013-013-9539-2) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12013-013-9539-2&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23443810&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 26. Li D, Lu Z, Jia J, et al. Changes in microRNAs associated with podocytic adhesion damage under mechanical stress. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2013;14:97–102.[doi:10.1177/1470320312460071](http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470320312460071) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1470320312460071&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23087255&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 27. Petrica L, Vlad M, Vlad A, et al. Podocyturia parallels proximal tubule dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients independently of albuminuria and renal function decline: A cross-sectional study. J Diabetes Complications 2017;31:1444–50.[doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.01.007](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.01.007) 28. Petrica L, Ursoniu S, Gadalean F, et al. Urinary podocyte-associated mRNA levels correlate with proximal tubule dysfunction in early diabetic nephropathy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2017;9:31–43.[doi:10.1186/s13098-017-0228-y](http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-017-0228-y) 29. Anon. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2013;3:1–150. [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/kisup.2012.73&link_type=DOI) 30. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med 2012;367:20–9.[doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1114248](http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1114248) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa1114248&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22762315&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000305979400002&link_type=ISI) 31. Zhong X, Chung AC, Chen HY, et al. miR-21 is a key therapeutic target for renal injury in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2013;56:663–74.[doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2804-x](http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2804-x) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00125-012-2804-x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23292313&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000314531700026&link_type=ISI) 32. Lai JY, Luo J, O’Connor C, et al. MicroRNA-21 in glomerular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26:805–16.[doi:10.1681/ASN.2013121274](http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2013121274) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiam5lcGhyb2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMjYvNC84MDUiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo0MjoiL2ppbS9lYXJseS8yMDE4LzAxLzA1L2ppbS0yMDE3LTAwMDU1Ni5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 33. Kern EF, Erhard P, Sun W, et al. Early urinary markers of diabetic kidney disease: a nested case-control study from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Am J Kidney Dis 2010;55:824–34.[doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.009](http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.009) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.009&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20138413&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000277242600006&link_type=ISI) 34. Kim SS, Song SH, Kim IJ, et al. Clinical implication of urinary tubular markers in the early stage of nephropathy with type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;97:251–7.[doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.02.019](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.02.019) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.diabres.2012.02.019&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22440044&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 35. Fu WJ, Li BL, Wang SB, et al. Changes of the tubular markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus with glomerular hyperfiltration. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;95:105–9.[doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.031](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.031) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.031&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22015481&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 36. Sheira G, Noreldin N, Tamer A, et al. Urinary biomarker N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase can predict severity of renal damage in diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2015;14:1–5.[doi:10.1186/s40200-015-0133-6](http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40200-015-0133-6) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s40200-014-0127-9&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25654061&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 37. Bouvet BR, Paparella CV, Arriaga SM, et al. Evaluation of urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase as a marker of early renal damage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2014;58:798–801.[doi:10.1590/0004-2730000003010](http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-2730000003010) 38. Krupa A, Jenkins R, Luo DD, et al. Loss of MicroRNA-192 promotes fibrogenesis in diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21:438–47.[doi:10.1681/ASN.2009050530](http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2009050530) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiam5lcGhyb2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMjEvMy80MzgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo0MjoiL2ppbS9lYXJseS8yMDE4LzAxLzA1L2ppbS0yMDE3LTAwMDU1Ni5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 39. Chung AC, Huang XR, Meng X, et al. miR-192 mediates TGF-beta/Smad3-driven renal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21:1317–25.[doi:10.1681/ASN.2010020134](http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2010020134) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiam5lcGhyb2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiMjEvOC8xMzE3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NDI6Ii9qaW0vZWFybHkvMjAxOC8wMS8wNS9qaW0tMjAxNy0wMDA1NTYuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 40. Kato M, Natarajan R. MicroRNAs in diabetic nephropathy: functions, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2015;1353:72–88.[doi:10.1111/nyas.12758](http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12758) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/nyas.12758&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25877817&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 41. Fiorentino L, Cavalera M, Mavilio M, et al. Regulation of TIMP3 in diabetic nephropathy: a role for microRNAs. Acta Diabetol 2013;50:965–9.[doi:10.1007/s00592-013-0492-8](http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-013-0492-8) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00592-013-0492-8&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23797704&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 42. Nauta FL, Boertien WE, Bakker SJ, et al. Glomerular and tubular damage markers are elevated in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:975–81.[doi:10.2337/dc10-1545](http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1545) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIzNC80Lzk3NSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjQyOiIvamltL2Vhcmx5LzIwMTgvMDEvMDUvamltLTIwMTctMDAwNTU2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 43. Ozdemir AM, Hopfer U, Erhard P, et al. Processing advanced glycation end product-modified albumin by the renal proximal tubule and the early pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1043:625–36.[doi:10.1196/annals.1338.071](http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1338.071) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1196/annals.1338.071&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16037286&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 44. Ye H, Bai X, Gao H, et al. Urinary podocalyxin positive-element occurs in the early stage of diabetic nephropathy and is correlated with a clinical diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Complications 2014;28:96–100.[doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.08.006](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.08.006) 45. Jeon YK, Kim MR, Huh JE, et al. Cystatin C as an early biomarker of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Korean Med Sci 2011;26:258–63.[doi:10.3346/jkms.2011.26.2.258](http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.2.258) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3346/jkms.2011.26.2.258&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21286018&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 46. Kravaritou M, Thanopoulou A, Karamanos B, et al. Evidence that even “normal” albuminuria may denote incipient GFR reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009;85:317–21.[doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.06.019](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2009.06.019) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19596469&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) 47. Jerums G, Panagiotopoulos S, Premaratne E, et al. Integrating albuminuria and GFR in the assessment of diabetic nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 2009;5:397–406.[doi:10.1038/nrneph.2009.91](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2009.91) [CrossRef](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrneph.2009.91&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19556994&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjim%2Fearly%2F2018%2F01%2F05%2Fjim-2017-000556.atom) [Web of Science](/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000267342600008&link_type=ISI) 48. Jenkins RH, Martin J, Phillips AO, et al. Pleiotropy of microRNA-192 in the kidney. Biochem Soc Trans 2012;40:762–7.[doi:10.1042/BST20120085](http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST20120085) [Abstract/FREE Full Text](/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoicHBiaW9zdCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI0MC80Lzc2MiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjQyOiIvamltL2Vhcmx5LzIwMTgvMDEvMDUvamltLTIwMTctMDAwNTU2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)