Difference in calories ordered among Hispanic participants who did or did not notice and use the labels
| Variable | Noticed labels | p Value* | Used labels | p Value* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |||
| Calorie labels menu | ||||||
| N (%) | 94 (76.4) | 29 (23.6) | 33 (26.8) | 90 (73.1) | ||
| Calories ordered (kcal) | 740 (510, 970) | 950 (645, 1170) | 0.24 | 660 (360, 950) | 830 (570, 1030) | 0.07 |
| Exercise labels menu | ||||||
| N (%) | 89 (72.9) | 33 (27.1) | 31 (25.4) | 91 (74.6) | ||
| Calories ordered (kcal) | 735 (520, 990) | 820 (530, 1060) | 0.90 | 800 (470, 990) | 735 (520, 1045) | 0.95 |
Calories ordered (kcal) are shown as medians and 25th and 75th centiles.
*A factorial ANOVA model was used to examine the effect of menu condition and whether or not the subjects noticed or used the labels on calories ordered.