Major themes and definitions | Group A early-career faculty n=8 | Group B mid-career faculty n=9 | Group C senior faculty n=9 | Total |
Session structure/format: | ||||
1.0 Operations and program logistics such as meeting times, locations, length, and frequency | 25 | 24 | 13 | 62 |
1.1 Small groups to foster collaborative learning | 10 | 11 | 2 | 23 |
1.2 Individualized feedback from a grant writing expert | 4 | 9 | 7 | 20 |
1.3 Networking with colleagues | 7 | 3 | 2 | 12 |
1.4 Include individuals that could provide more insight into the grant reviewing perspective and tips and tricks to grant writing | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Total | 49 | 49 | 24 | 122 |
Mentorship: | ||||
2.0 Resources for mentors | 15 | 18 | 9 | 42 |
2.1 Being a good mentor—resources to support mentors to improve their mentoring | 8 | 12 | 4 | 24 |
2.2 The importance of mentors being more engaged in their mentee’s career development | 3 | 0 | 11 | 14 |
2.3 Being a good mentee—qualities/actions that make a good mentee | 2 | 4 | 7 | 13 |
2.4 Incentivizing mentoring | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Total | 29 | 34 | 32 | 95 |
Individualized pathways to independence: | ||||
3.1 Finding appropriate grants that match career interests | 17 | 7 | 10 | 34 |
3.2 Best practices in grant writing | 9 | 1 | 8 | 13 |
3.3 Compelling storytelling through refined grant writing to secure more funding | 0 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
3.4 Simulate review process to help research investigators write successful grants | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
3.5 Navigating NIH/institutional resources | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
3.6 Revising for resubmitting grants after feedback | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Total | 28 | 16 | 23 | 67 |