Table 2

Distribution and accuracy of selected mortality prediction tools

Prediction toolTotal
(N=166)
Died
(n=47)
Survived
(n=119)
Original AUC (95% CI)Observed AUC (95% CI)
Clinical gestalt, confidence (IQR)30 (20–50)
80 (70–90)
40 (30–70)
80 (60–90)
30 (15–40)
80 (70–90)
0.68 (0.59 to 0.77)
LOW-HARM (IQR)46 (8.4–83.8)86 (37.5–99.3)37.5 (6.4–69)0.96 (0.94 to 0.98)0.76 (0.69 to 0.84)
LOW-HARM V.2 (IQR)9.7 (0.9–52.7)49 (9.7–96.3)3.2 (0.5–28.1)0.78 (0.71 to 0.86)
NUTRI-CoV (IQR)9 (7–12)10 (8–12)9 (7–11)0.79 (0.76 to 0.82)0.60 (0.51 to 0.69)
MSL-COVID-19 (IQR)8 (7–10)8 (8–10)8 (7–9)0.72 (0.69 to 0.75)0.64 (0.55 to 0.73)
qSOFA (IQR)1 (1–1)1 (1–2)1 (1–1)0.74 (0.65 to 0.81)0.61 (0.53 to 0.69)
NEWS2 (IQR)7.5 (6–9)9 (7–10)7 (5–9)0.84 (0.79 to 0.90)0.65 (0.56 to 0.75)
Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >9.8 (%)64.455.327.70.74 (0.62 to 0.85)0.65 (0.57 to 0.73)
  • Overall comparison test for observed AUC=0.002.

  • Individual AUROC comparisons: clinical gestalt vs all scores, p>0.05.

  • To calculate the relative mean difference, some scores (those not based on 100 points) were converted to a percentage in the following manner: (patient score/maximum possible score)×100.

  • AUC, area under the curve.