Review
PKA: Lessons learned after twenty years

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.03.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We discovered a hydrophobic spine architecture in protein kinases.

  • This architecture defines highly dynamic nature of protein kinases.

  • We report diverse quaternary structures for different isoforms of protein kinase A.

Abstract

The first protein kinase structure, solved in 1991, revealed the fold that is shared by all members of the eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily and showed how the conserved sequence motifs cluster mostly around the active site. This structure of the PKA catalytic (C) subunit showed also how a single phosphate integrated the entire molecule. Since then the EPKs have become a major drug target, second only to the G-protein coupled receptors. Although PKA provided a mechanistic understanding of catalysis that continues to serve as a prototype for the family, by comparing many active and inactive kinases we subsequently discovered a hydrophobic spine architecture that is a characteristic feature of all active kinases. The ways in which the regulatory spine is dynamically assembled is the defining feature of each protein kinase. Protein kinases have thus evolved to be molecular switches, like the G-proteins, and unlike metabolic enzymes which have evolved to be efficient catalysis. PKA also shows how the dynamic tails surround the core and serve as essential regulatory elements. The phosphorylation sites in PKA, introduced both co- and post-translationally, are very stable. The resulting C-subunit is then packaged as an inhibited holoenzyme with cAMP-binding regulatory (R) subunits so that PKA activity is regulated exclusively by cAMP, not by the dynamic turnover of an activation loop phosphate. We could not understand activation and inhibition without seeing structures of R:C complexes; however, to appreciate the structural uniqueness of each R2:C2 holoenzyme required solving structures of tetrameric holoenzymes. It is these tetrameric holoenzymes that are localized to discrete sites in the cell, typically by A Kinase Anchoring Proteins where they create discrete foci for PKA signaling. Understanding these dynamic macromolecular complexes is the challenge that we now face. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Inhibitors of Protein Kinases (2012).

Introduction

As we look back over the past two decades since the first protein kinase structure was solved, we find that we are entering a new era in our understanding not only of cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase (PKA) but also of all protein kinases. Although our most comprehensive understanding of the protein kinases at the molecular level has come from crystal structures, we are now coming to appreciate that these are surprisingly dynamic molecules that have specifically evolved to be highly regulated molecular switches and not efficient catalysts [1]. Thus our conventional ways of looking at enzymes may have to be revisited when we think about these regulated switches that work on proteins, not peptides, and are part of dynamic and typically oscillating macromolecular complexes. Furthermore, although the eukaryotic protein kinases (EPKs) all share a conserved kinase core, they are regulated in highly dynamic ways by the tails and linker segments that flank that kinase core. These dynamic flanking regions are frequently an integral part of the active kinase; however, unlike the conserved core, they differ in each kinase. Almost every protein kinase is also regulated in some way by phosphorylation whether it is mediated by auto-phosphorylation or by a heterologous kinase. Some of these phosphorylation sites lie in the core, specifically in the activation loop, while other sites are in the tails and linkers. These phosphates can play very different roles.

So at this point in time, just over twenty years since the first protein kinase structure was solved, we find ourselves with an enormous amount of information about this enzyme family, which has also become a major drug target for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. We are also now entering a new era of computation where we can carry out simulations of proteins that reach μs to ms time scales, which lie in the range where most catalytic and regulatory functions occur. This allows us for the first time to actually experimentally validate the simulations. Advances in NMR spectroscopy where we can explore the residue-specific dynamics of a protein in solution are also revealing new insights about the dynamic properties of this enzyme family [2], [3], [4]. Instead of being limited to the static structures that are defined in a crystal lattice, we can now begin to explore in a far more comprehensive way how these proteins behave in solution. Most importantly we are coming to appreciate that these molecules have evolved to do something different from metabolic enzymes that we have studied so intensely in the past. Whereas the metabolic enzymes have evolved to be efficient catalysts that turn over large amounts of small molecule substrates, the protein kinases, like the GTPases, have evolved to be molecular switches that initiate a cascade of downstream signaling events. Often they function as part of a macromolecular complex under single turnover conditions where the substrate and kinase are in a 1:1 complex. While efficient catalysis is important for a metabolic enzyme, dynamic and precise regulation is essential for a switch. Oscillating between off and on states is essential for almost every protein kinase.

Section snippets

Evolution of the eukaryotic protein kinases as dynamic and regulated molecular switches

It is remarkable how our definition of the protein kinase family has remained so stable over the past 20 years. Although the potential for the covalent addition of a phosphate to regulate the function of a protein and, in particular, to mediate the equilibrium between active and inactive conformations, was first recognized by the pioneering work of Krebs and Fischer with glycogen phosphorylase [5], we did not initially appreciate the vastness of this enzyme family nor did we appreciate the full

Molecular features that distinguish the EPKs from the ELKs

The eukaryotic protein kinases (EPKs) evolved from the eukaryotic like kinases (ELKs) and are distinguished from the ELKs by two structural elements that contribute to their function and regulation [1], [12]. The EPKs have a large and highly dynamic activation segment that is inserted between β strand 9 and the αF helix. In most kinases this loop exists in an inactive conformation or sometimes a disordered state when the kinase is not active. Activation is typically achieved by phosphorylation

Internal architecture of the EPKs is described by dynamically assembled hydrophobic spines

Because the protein kinases are so biologically important and because protein kinase mutations are associated with so many diseases, they have become major targets for drug discovery. We thus have many protein kinase structures that serve as templates for drug discovery. Having a structural kinome as well as a sequence-based kinome allows us to delve more deeply into the structural features that define this enzyme family. By comparing many protein kinase structures and asking what was different

Linkers, tails and inserts

While the kinase core is conserved in every protein kinase, it is important to recognize that the core alone is not sufficient to define an active kinase. The tails and linkers that flank the core, although often dynamic in nature, are also often an essential part of an active kinase, as is the activation segment which is inserted between β strand 8 and the αF-helix. In many cases there are also inhibitor domains or motifs that are embedded within the same gene as the kinase core as in the case

Regulation by phosphorylation

Phosphates play an exceptional role in biology. The importance of phosphates for energy (ATP) and for information transfer (DNA and RNA) was reviewed comprehensively by Westheimer in 1987 [22], but the major role that phosphates play in regulation was completely ignored. The unique chemical features of a phosphate that allow it to play such an important role in signal transduction are captured in the recent review by Hunter [23]. A phosphate can play many different roles. In some cases it can

Assembly of a tetrameric holoenzyme

While we have learned much about PKA and about the protein kinase family in general from the analysis of the isolated C-subunit, in cells PKA exists primarily as an inactive tetrameric holoenzyme. The regulatory subunits are constitutive dimers due to the N-terminal four-helix bundle that is referred to as the dimerization/docking domain. The name reflects its bi-functional properties where, in addition to dimerization, it serves as a docking site for A Kinase Anchoring Proteins (AKAPs) [27].

Reaction products are trapped in the RIIβ holoenzyme

Given that we have a perfectly formed cavity for ATP to bind, we decided to add MgATP to the crystals hoping to trap a transition state intermediate. Surprisingly, we found that ADP and the phosphorylated RIIβ subunit, along with two Mg2 + ions, were trapped in the crystal lattice. Typically the phosphorylated peptide is released rapidly leaving release of the bound ADPMg2 as the slow and rate-limiting step of catalysis. In the case of the RIIβ holoenzyme, the off-rate of the substrate is

Targeted holoenzymes

The structures of the tetrameric PKA holoenzymes are causing us to reconsider our ideas about PKA signaling in cells where localization of the holoenzyme is so important for achieving specificity. Furthermore, we cannot think of the kinase alone without considering that scaffold proteins such as AKAPs that bring together a community of signaling proteins that are in close proximity to a dedicated substrate such as the tail of a voltage gated ion channel. Calcineurin, a calcium activated

Conclusions

In this review we highlight the features that define the protein kinase superfamily as being unique and distinct from metabolic enzymes. We review first how the eukaryotic protein kinases (EPKs) have evolved from the eukaryotic-like kinases (ELKs) to be regulated and highly dynamic molecular switches that phosphorylate proteins as opposed to small peptides. In addition to the conserved kinase core, the EPKs are regulated by flanking linkers, and, like the activation loop that is inserted into

Acknowledgements

Support for this research was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM19301, GM34921 and DK54441) and by University of California San Diego Graduate Training Program in Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology through National Institutes of Health Institutional Training Grant T32 GM007752 from the NIGMS and by Ruth L.

Kirschstein National Research Service Award NIH/NCI T32 CA009523 (to J. M. S.).

References (43)

  • J.M. Steichen et al.

    Structural basis for the regulation of protein kinase A by activation loop phosphorylation

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2012)
  • J.M. Steichen et al.

    Global consequences of activation loop phosphorylation on protein kinase A

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2010)
  • F.S. Kinderman et al.

    A dynamic mechanism for AKAP binding to RII isoforms of cAMP-dependent protein kinase

    Mol. Cell

    (2006)
  • G.N. Sarma et al.

    Structure of D-AKAP2:PKA RI complex: insights into AKAP specificity and selectivity

    Structure

    (2010)
  • L.J. Huang et al.

    Identification of a novel protein kinase A anchoring protein that binds both type I and type II regulatory subunits

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1997)
  • P.P. Burgers et al.

    A small novel A-kinase anchoring protein (AKAP) that localizes specifically protein kinase A-regulatory subunit I (PKA-RI) to the plasma membrane

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2012)
  • S. Whitehouse et al.

    Mg X ATP2-dependent interaction of the inhibitor protein of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase with the catalytic subunit

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1983)
  • S. Manni et al.

    Phosphorylation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) regulatory subunit modulates PKA–AKAP interaction, substrate phosphorylation, and calcium signaling in cardiac cells

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2008)
  • B.R. Martin et al.

    Isoform-specific PKA dynamics revealed by dye-triggered aggregation and DAKAP1alpha-mediated localization in living cells

    Chem. Biol.

    (2007)
  • M. Tresguerres et al.

    Intracellular cAMP signaling by soluble adenylyl cyclase

    Kidney Int.

    (2011)
  • S.S. Taylor et al.

    Evolution of the eukaryotic protein kinases as dynamic molecular switches

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B

    (2012)
  • Cited by (215)

    • Epac as a tractable therapeutic target

      2023, European Journal of Pharmacology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Inhibitors of Protein Kinases (2012).

    View full text