Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Neurexin mediates the assembly of presynaptic terminals

Abstract

Neurexins are a large family of proteins that act as neuronal cell-surface receptors. The function and localization of the various neurexins, however, have not yet been clarified. Beta-neurexins are candidate receptors for neuroligin-1, a postsynaptic membrane protein that can trigger synapse formation at axon contacts. Here we report that neurexins are concentrated at synapses and that purified neuroligin is sufficient to cluster neurexin and to induce presynaptic differentiation. Oligomerization of neuroligin is required for its function, and we find that beta-neurexin clustering is sufficient to trigger the recruitment of synaptic vesicles through interactions that require the cytoplasmic domain of neurexin. We propose a two-step model in which postsynaptic neuroligin multimers initially cluster axonal neurexins. In response to this clustering, neurexins nucleate the assembly of a cytoplasmic scaffold to which the exocytotic apparatus is recruited.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Synaptogenic activity of neuroligin.
Figure 2: Inactive neuroligin mutants are impaired in neuroligin/neurexin mediated cell adhesion.
Figure 3: Oligomerization of the neuroligin-1 AChE-homologous domain.
Figure 4: Neurexins are concentrated in growth cones and at synaptic junctions.
Figure 5: Overexpression of neuroligin-1 induces recruitment of neurexin to newly forming synapses.
Figure 6: Induction of neurexin clustering and presynaptic differentiation by purified neuroligin.
Figure 7: Clustering of neurexin is sufficient to induce recruitment of synaptic vesicles.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanes, J.R. & Lichtman, J.W. Development of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 389–442 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garner, C.C., Zhai, R.G., Gundelfinger, E.D. & Ziv, N.E. Molecular mechanisms of CNS synaptogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 25, 243–251 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheiffele, P. Cell-cell signaling during synapse formation in the CNS. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 485–508 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ichtchenko, K. et al. Neuroligin 1: a splice site-specific ligand for beta-neurexins. Cell 81, 435–443 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Song, J.Y., Ichtchenko, K., Sudhof, T.C. & Brose, N. Neuroligin 1 is a postsynaptic cell-adhesion molecule of excitatory synapses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1100–1105 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheiffele, P. et al. Neuroligin expressed in nonneuronal cells triggers presynaptic development in contacting axons. Cell 101, 657–669 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ichtchenko, K., Nguyen, T. & Sudhof, T.C. Structures, alternative splicing, and neurexin binding of multiple neuroligins. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2676–2682 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Biederer, T. & Sudhof, T.C. Mints as adaptors. Direct binding to neurexins and recruitment of munc18. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 39803–39806 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurschner, C., Mermelstein, P.G., Holden, W.T. & Surmeier, D.J. CIPP, a novel multivalent PDZ domain protein, selectively interacts with Kir4.0 family members, NMDA receptor subunits, neurexins, and neuroligins. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 11, 161–172 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bourne, Y., Taylor, P., Bougis, P.E. & Marchot, P. Crystal structure of mouse acetylcholinesterase. A peripheral site-occluding loop in a tetrameric assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2963–2970 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morel, N. et al. Acetylcholinesterase H and T dimers are associated through the same contact. Mutations at this interface interfere with the C-terminal T peptide, inducing degradation rather than secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 37379–37389 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bon, S., Toutant, J.P., Meflah, K. & Massoulie, J. Amphiphilic and nonamphiphilic forms of Torpedo cholinesterases: solubility and aggregation properties. J. Neurochem. 51, 776–785 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ushkaryov, Y.A., Petrenko, A.G., Geppert, M. & Sudhof, T.C. Neurexins: synaptic cell surface proteins related to the alpha-latrotoxin receptor and laminin. Science 257, 50–56 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tobaben, S., Sudhof, T.C. & Stahl, B. Genetic analysis of alpha-latrotoxin receptors reveals functional interdependence of CIRL/latrophilin 1 and neurexin 1 alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 6359–6365 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugita, S., Khvochtev, M. & Sudhof, T.C. Neurexins are functional alpha-latrotoxin receptors. Neuron 22, 489–496 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Russell, A.B. & Carlson, S.S. Neurexin is expressed on nerves, but not at nerve terminals, in the electric organ. J. Neurosci. 17, 4734–4743 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Littleton, J.T., Bhat, M.A. & Bellen, H.J. Deciphering the function of neurexins at cellular junctions. J. Cell Biol. 137, 793–796 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sudhof, T.C. alpha-Latrotoxin and its receptors: neurexins and CIRL/latrophilins. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 933–962 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dustin, M.L. & Colman, D.R. Neural and immunological synaptic relations. Science 298, 785–789 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hata, Y., Butz, S. & Sudhof, T.C. CASK: a novel dlg/PSD95 homolog with an N-terminal calmodulin-dependent protein kinase domain identified by interaction with neurexins. J. Neurosci. 16, 2488–2494 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Butz, S., Okamoto, M. & Sudhof, T.C. A tripartite protein complex with the potential to couple synaptic vesicle exocytosis to cell adhesion in brain. Cell 94, 773–782 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Palmer, A. et al. EphrinB phosphorylation and reverse signaling: regulation by Src kinases and PTP-BL phosphatase. Mol. Cell. 9, 725–737 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cowan, C.A. & Henkemeyer, M. The SH2/SH3 adaptor Grb4 transduces B-ephrin reverse signals. Nature 413, 174–179 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Holland, S.J. et al. Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 383, 722–725 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brückner, K., Pasquale, E.B. & Klein, R. Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors. Science 275, 1640–1643 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall, A.C., Lucas, F.R. & Salinas, P.C. Axonal remodeling and synaptic differentiation in the cerebellum is regulated by WNT-7a signaling. Cell 100, 525–535 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shapiro, L. & Colman, D.R. The diversity of cadherins and implications for a synaptic adhesive code in the CNS. Neuron 23, 427–430 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Uemura, T. The cadherin superfamily at the synapse: more members, more missions. Cell 93, 1095–1098 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mayford, M. et al. Modulation of an NCAM-related adhesion molecule with long-term synaptic plasticity in Aplysia. Science 256, 638–644 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Biederer, T. et al. SynCAM, a synaptic adhesion molecule that drives synapse assembly. Science 297, 1525–1531 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamagata, M., Weiner, J. & Sanes, J. Sidekicks. Synaptic adhesion molecules that promote lamina-specific connectivity in the retina. Cell 110, 649–660 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dalva, M.B. et al. EphB receptors interact with NMDA receptors and regulate excitatory synapse formation. Cell 103, 945–956 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hatten, M.E. Neuronal regulation of astroglial morphology and proliferation in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 100, 384–396 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stein, E. et al. Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. Genes Dev. 12, 667–678 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson, J.D. et al. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876–4882 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sanchez, R. & Sali, A. Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MODELLER-3. Proteins 1 (Suppl.), 50–58 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Carson, M. Ribbons 2.0. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 958–961 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Serafini and M. Tessier-Lavigne for their generous support during the early phase of this project, N. Brose and F. Varoqueaux for anti-neuroligin-1 antibodies, and A. Broder for technical assistance. Beads coated with lipid bilayers were generated in collaboration with M. Baksh, S. Pautot, and J. Groves. We also thank J. Dodd, C. Mason, M-M. Poo and members of the Poo lab for support and sharing equipment, and O. Hobert, T. Jessell and M-M. Poo for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by funds to P.S. from the Searle Scholar Program, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Esther A. & Joseph Klingenstein Fund and the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation, and a grant from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) to E.I. (R01MH60771). C.D. was supported by a NIH training grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Scheiffele.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Generation and activity of neuroligin mutants. (a) Western blot analysis of chimeric neuroligin-AChE constructs demonstrates comparable expression levels for all mutants. Lysates of transfected HEK293 cells were separated by SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-HA antibodies (upper panel) or anti-tubulin antibodies as a loading control (lower panel). (b) Schematic representation of neuroligin-AChE chimeras. Neuroligin sequences are shown in black, and introduced homologous AChE sequences in red. Synaptogenic activity of each construct was qualitatively scored in a blinded fashion with respect to the transfected protein by evaluating clustering of synaptic vesicles in pontine axons at contacts with HEK293 cells expressing the mutant proteins and is indicated as positive (+) or negative (-). (c) Western blot analysis of alanine replacement mutants. Lysates of HEK293 cells transfected with the mutants were separated by SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-HA antibodies (upper panel) or anti-tubulin antibodies as loading control (lower panel). (d) Quantitation of synapsin accumulation in pontine axons contacting HEK293 cells expressing alanine mutant constructs (see Methods for details). (JPG 45 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2.

Heterophilic adhesion by neuroligins and neurexins. PC12 cells expressing N-cadherin show homophilic adhesion. PC12 cells that were separately transfected with neuroligin-1 and beta-neurexin and that were subsequently mixed form aggregates in a calcium-dependent manner. No homophilic aggregation is observed for cells expressing only neuroligin or only neurexin.Scale bar is 100μm. (JPG 21 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3.

Synaptic localization and synapse-promoting activity of neuroligin-1. (a-c) Hippocampal neurons were immunostained with antibodies against neuroligin-1 (a, green in overlay) and antibodies against the synaptic vesicle marker synaptophysin (b, red in overlay). (d-f) Hippocampal neurons expressing EGFP. Cells were transfected after 12 days in vitro, maintained for two days and immunostained with antibodies against synapsin (e, red in overlay). EGFP fluorescence is shown in (d, green in overlay). (g-i) Hippocampal neurons expressing HA-tagged neuroligin-1. Cells were transfected after 12 days in vitro, maintained for two days and immunostained with antibodies against the HA-tag to detect neuroligin (green) and antibodies against PSD-95 (red). In younger cells maintained for 3-5 days in vitro and cells with very high expression levels of HA-neuroligin-1 the protein also localized to non-synaptic regions of the plasma membrane (not shown). Scale bar is 5 μm in (a) and 15 μm in (g). (JPG 64 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4.

Characterization of neuroligin-GPI-coated silica beads. (a) DIC image of uncoated 5 μm silica beads. (b) Lipid-coated silica beads labeled with Texas Red-conjugated dipalmityol-glycerol that was incorporated into the lipid bilayers visualized by fluorescence microscopy. (c) Silica beads coated with lipid bilayers containing HA-tagged GPI-neuroligin, immunostained with anti-HA antibodies (red) and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. (d-f) Control beads coated with lipid bilayers containing Texas Red-conjugated dipalmityol-glycerol (d, red in overlay) were added to 10 DIV hippocampal cultures for 24 hours and were immunostained for the synaptic vesicle marker synapsin (e, green in overlay). Scale bar is 5μm. (JPG 24 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5.

Clustering of neurexin is sufficient to induce recruitment of synaptic vesicles. (a-c) Monomeric anti-VSV antibodies (without secondary antibody) were added to 12 day old hippocampal cultures transfected with VSV-neurexin . Clustered VSV-neurexin (a, green in the overlay) and the distribution of synapsin (b, red in overlay) are shown. (d-g) Vesicle recruitment occurred only in the same cell expressing neurexin and not in a cell contacting a VSV-neurexin expressing cell. A synaptobrevin/VAMP2-EGFP fusion protein was co-expressed with VSV-neurexin from a dual expression vector. Like endogenous synaptic vesicle markers VAMP2/EGFP (e, red in overlay) was recruited to VSV-neurexin clusters (d, green in overlay). No concentration of the postsynaptic marker GluR2/3 was observed at these sites (f, blue in overlay). Scale bar is 20 μm in (a) and 10 μm in (d). (JPG 27 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 6.

Hypothetical model for induction of presynaptic differentiation by lateral clustering of neuroligin/neurexin. (a) Oligomers of neuroligin-1 (red) in the postsynaptic membrane recruit multiple neurexins (blue) in the presynaptic membrane, resulting in lateral clustering of neurexins. The cytoplasmic tails of the clustered neurexin proteins recruit scaffolding and signaling molecules, possibly via the PDZ-binding motif at the C-terminus. This scaffold may then signal the assembly of the exocytotic machinery and recruit additional neurexins and thereby neuroligins to form an expanding contact zone. Postsynaptic neuroligin-1 oligomers may contribute to the assembly of the postsynaptic specializations by interaction with signaling and/or scaffolding proteins such as PSD-95, which also binds to glutamate receptors. (b) Clustering of epitope-tagged neurexins with multimerized antibodies mimics the presynapse inducing activity of neuroligin-1 multimers. Antibodies were incubated at a 10:1 molar ratio of primary to secondary antibodies maximally resulting in 2:1 antibody complexes with four VSV-neurexin binding sites. These complexes likely resemble the binding capacity of neuroligin-1 tetramers although they are likely to have much higher binding affinity. (JPG 49 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dean, C., Scholl, F., Choih, J. et al. Neurexin mediates the assembly of presynaptic terminals. Nat Neurosci 6, 708–716 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1074

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing