Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Are dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry regional estimates associated with visceral adipose tissue mass?

International Journal of Obesity volume 26, pages 978–983 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective: Recent studies support the possibility of estimating abdominal fat using a region of interest (ROI) selected by conventional whole body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This is an important observation as DXA ROI estimates have some advantages over waist circumference or computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a means of assessing visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and adipose tissue distribution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of DXA abdominal ROI estimates in assessing VAT among non-obese men.

Design: Observational, cross-sectional study comparing correlations between MRI-measured total VAT and surrogate measures including DXA ROIs. A stepwise multiple regression model was applied to derive a predictive equation with total VAT mass.

Subjects: Ninety non-obese healthy men between the ages of 18 and 44 y with BMI<30 kg/m2.

Measurements: Abdominal adipose tissue and total VAT were measured by whole body MRI; VAT area by single-slice MRI at the L4–5 level; specific DXA ROIs for abdominal regional fat defined as ROI A (L2–4), B (L2-upper iliac), C (lower costal-upper iliac), and D (ROI C excluding spine); and simple anthropometric measures.

Results: Correlations between total VAT and ROIs A (r=0.85) and B (r=0.84) were not significantly different from that of VAT area at L4–5 (r=0.87), but significantly higher (P <0.01) than that of waist circumference (r=0.77). The highest correlations with total abdominal adipose tissue were for DXA ROIs and conventional DXA trunk fat (r=0.95–0.97). A stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that 86% of the variance in total VAT was predicted by VAT area at L4–5, ROI A, and waist-hip ratio.

Conclusions: DXA ROIs (L2–4, L2-upper iliac) were associated with total VAT as well as MRI-derived VAT area at L4–5 in non-obese men. DXA ROI fat distribution estimates may be useful in the early detection of men with abdominal/visceral obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lapidus L, Bengtsson C, Larsson B, Pennert K, Rybo E, Sjostrom L . Distribution of adipose tissue and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: a 12 y follow up of participants in the population study of women in Guthenburg, Sweden Br Med J 1984 289: 1257–1261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Donahue RP, Abbott RD, Bloom E, Reed DM, Yano K . Central obesity and coronary heart disease in men Lancet 1987 i: 822–824.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ohlson L-O, Larsson B, Svardsudd K, Welin L, Eriksson H, Wilhelmsen L, Bjorntorp P, Tibblin G . The influence of body fat distribution on the incidence of diabetes mellitus 13.5 y of follow-up of the participants in the study of men born in 1913 Diabetes 1985 34: 1055–1058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Seidell JC, Han TS, Feskens EJ, Lean ME . Narrow hips and broad waist circumferences independently contribute to increased risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus J Intern Med 1997 242: 401–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Terry R, Page W, Haskell W . Waist/hip ratio, body mass index and premature cardiovascular disease mortality in US Army veterans during a twenty-three year follow-up study Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992 16: 417–423.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rexrode KM, Carey VJ, Hennekens CH, Walters EE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Manson JE . Abdominal adiposity and coronary heart disease in women JAMA 1998 280: 1843–1848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Despres JP, Ross R, Lemieux S . Imaging techniques applied to the measurement of human body composition In: Roche AF, Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG Human body composition Human Kinetics: Chicago, IL 1996 pp 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Molarius A, Seidell JC . Selection of anthropometric indicators for classification of abdominal fatness—a critical review Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998 22: 719–727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heymsfield SB, Allison DB, Wang Z-M . Evaluation of total and regional body composition In: Bray GA, Bouchard C, James WPT Handbook of obesity Marcel Deker: New York 1998 pp 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ross R, Pedwell H, Rissanen J . Effects of energy restriction and exercise on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in women as measured by magnetic resonance imaging Am J Clin Nutr 1995 61: 1179–1185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris TB, Visser M, Everhart J, Cauley J, Tylavsky F, Fuerst T et al. Waist circumference and sagittal diameter reflect total body fat better than visceral fat in older men and women: the health, aging and body composition study Ann NY Acad Sci 2000 904: 462–473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ross R, Leger L, Morris D, De Guise J, Guardo R . Quantification of adipose tissue by MRI: relationship with anthropometric variables J Appl Physiol 1992 72: 787–795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlemmer A, Hassager C, Haarbo J, Christiansen C . Direct measurement of abdominal fat by dual photon absorptiometry Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1990 14: 603–611.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Svendsen OL, Hassager C, Bergmann I, Christiansen C . Measurement of abdominal and intraabdominal fat in postmenopausal women by dual X-ray absorptiometry and anthrometry: comparison with computerized tomography Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993 17: 45–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taaffe DR, Lewis B, Marcus R . Regional fat distribution by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with anthropometry and application in a clinical trial of growth hormone and exercise Clin Sci 1994 87: 581–586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen MD, Kanaley JA, Reed JE, Sheedy PF . Measurement of abdominal and visceral fat with computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry Am J Clin Nutr 1995 61: 274–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Treuth MS, Hunter GR, Kekes-Szabo T . Estimating intraabdominal adipose tissue in women by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Am J Clin Nutr 1995 62: 527–532.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jebb SA . Measurement of soft tissue composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Br J Nutr 1997 77: 151–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roubenoff R, Kehayias JJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Heymsfield SB . Use of duel-energy absorptiometry in body composition studies: not yet a ‘gold standard’ Am J Clin Nutr 1993 58: 589–591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Roubenoff R, Kehayias JJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Heymsfield SB . Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in body composition studies: not yet a ‘gold standard’ Am J Clin Nutr 1993 58: 589–591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gallagher D, Belmonte D, Deurenberg P, Wang J, Krasnow N, Pi-Sunyer FX, Heymsfield SB . Organ tissue mass measurement allows modeling of resting energy expenditure and metabolically active tissue mass Am J Physiol 1998 275: E249–E258.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamel EG, McNeill G, Van Wijk MCW . Usefulness of anthropometry and DXA in predicting intraabdominal fat in obese men and women Obes Res 2000 8: 36–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Clasey JL, Bouchard C, Teates CD, Riblett JE, Thorner MO, Hartman ML, Weltman A . The use of anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures to estimate total abdominal and abdominal visceral fat in men and women Obes Res 1999 7: 256–264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ross R . Magnetic Resonance Imaging provides new insights into the characterization of adipose and lean tissue distribution Can J Clin Pharmac 1996 74: 778–785.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gallagher D, Kovera AJ, Clay-Williams G, Agin D, Albu LJ, Matthews DE, Heymsfield SB . Weight loss in post-menopausal women: no evidence of adverse alterations in body composition Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000 279: 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Snyder WS, Cook MJ, Nasset ES, Karhausen LR, Howells GP, Tipton IH . Report of the Task Group on Reference Man International Commission on radiological protection, no. 23 Pergamon Press: Oxford 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kamel EG, McNeill G, Han TS, Smith FW, Avenell A, Davidson L, Tothill P . Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry in non-obese men and women Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999 23: 686–692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamel EG, McNeill G, Van Wijk MCW . Usefulness of anthropometry and DXA in predicting intra-abdominal fat in obese men and women Obes Res 2000 8: 36–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Der Kooy K, Leenen R, Seidell J, Deurenberg P, Visser M . Abdominal diameters as indicators of visceral fat: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry Br J Nutr 1993 70: 47–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertin E, Marcus C, Ruiz J-C, Eschard J-P, Leutenegger M . Measurement of visceral adipose tissue by DXA combined with anthropometry in obese humans Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000 24: 263–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carey DG . Abdominal obesity Curr Opin Lipidol 1998 9: 35–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Despres J-P, Krauss RM . Obesity and lipoprotein metabolism In: Bray GA, Bouchard C, James WPT Handbook of obesity Marcel Deker: New York 1998 pp 658–661.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Goodpaster BH, Thaete FL, Simoneau J-A, Kelly DE . Subcutaneous abdominal fat and thigh muscle composition predict insulin sensitivity independently of visceral fat Diabetes 1997 46: 1579–1585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Abate N, Garg A, Peshock RM, Stray-Gundersen J, Grundy SM . Relationship of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men J Clin Invest 1995 96: 88–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Paradisi G, Smith L, Burtner C, Leaming R, Garvey WT, Hook G et al. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of fat mass distribution and its association with the insulin resistance syndrome Diabetes Care 1999 22: 1310–1317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. NCEP Expert Panel. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA 2001 285: 2486–2497.

  37. Lemieux S, Prud'homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Despres JP . A single threshold value of waist girth identifies normal-weight and overweight subjects with excess visceral adipose tissue Am J Clin Nutr 1996 64: 685–693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Despres JP, Couillard C, Gagnon J, Bergeron J, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Bouchard C . Race, visceral adipose tissue, plasma lipids and lipoprotein lipase activity in men and women: the Health, Risk factors, Exercise training and Genetics (HERITAGE) family study Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000 20: 1932–1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Perry AC, Applegate EB, Jackson ML, Deprima S, Goldberg RB, Ross R, Kempner L, Feldman BB . Racial differences in visceral adipose tissue but not anthropometric markers of health-related variables J Appl Physiol 2000 89: 636–643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Park Y-W, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Gallagher D . Larger Amounts of visceral adipose tissue in Asian Americans Obes Res 2001 9: 381–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R29-AG14715 and P01-DK42618.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Korea

    Y-W Park

  2. Obesity Research Center, St Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Institute of Human Nutrition, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA

    Y-W Park, SB Heymsfield & D Gallagher

Authors
  1. Y-W Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. SB Heymsfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D Gallagher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Gallagher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, YW., Heymsfield, S. & Gallagher, D. Are dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry regional estimates associated with visceral adipose tissue mass?. Int J Obes 26, 978–983 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801982

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801982

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links